We call an array $$$a$$$ of length $$$n$$$ fancy if for each $$$1 \lt i \le n$$$ it holds that $$$a_i = a_{i-1} + 1$$$.

Let's call $$$f(p)$$$ applied to a permutation$$$^\dagger$$$ of length $$$n$$$ as the minimum number of subarrays it can be partitioned such that each one of them is fancy. For example $$$f([1,2,3]) = 1$$$, while $$$f([3,1,2]) = 2$$$ and $$$f([3,2,1]) = 3$$$.

Given $$$n$$$ and a permutation $$$p$$$ of length $$$n$$$, we define a permutation $$$p'$$$ of length $$$n$$$ to be $$$k$$$-special if and only if:

$$$p'$$$ is lexicographically smaller$$$^\ddagger$$$ than $$$p$$$, and
$$$f(p') = k$$$.

Your task is to count for each $$$1 \le k \le n$$$ the number of $$$k$$$-special permutations modulo $$$m$$$.

$$$^\dagger$$$ A permutation is an array consisting of $$$n$$$ distinct integers from $$$1$$$ to $$$n$$$ in arbitrary order. For example, $$$[2,3,1,5,4]$$$ is a permutation, but $$$[1,2,2]$$$ is not a permutation ($$$2$$$ appears twice in the array) and $$$[1,3,4]$$$ is also not a permutation ($$$n=3$$$ but there is $$$4$$$ in the array).

$$$^\ddagger$$$ A permutation $$$a$$$ of length $$$n$$$ is lexicographically smaller than a permutation $$$b$$$ of length $$$n$$$ if and only if the following holds: in the first position where $$$a$$$ and $$$b$$$ differ, the permutation $$$a$$$ has a smaller element than the corresponding element in $$$b$$$.

Input

The first line contains two integers $$$n$$$ and $$$m$$$ ($$$1 \le n \le 2000$$$, $$$10 \le m \le 10^9$$$) — the length of the permutation and the required modulo.

The second line contains $$$n$$$ distinct integers $$$p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_n$$$ ($$$1 \le p_i \le n$$$) — the permutation $$$p$$$.

Output

Print $$$n$$$ integers, where the $$$k$$$-th integer is the number of $$$k$$$-special permutations modulo $$$m$$$.

Note

In the first example, the permutations that are lexicographically smaller than $$$[1,3,4,2]$$$ are:

$$$[1,2,3,4]$$$, $$$f([1,2,3,4])=1$$$;
$$$[1,2,4,3]$$$, $$$f([1,2,4,3])=3$$$;
$$$[1,3,2,4]$$$, $$$f([1,3,2,4])=4$$$.

Thus our answer is $$$[1,0,1,1]$$$.

In the second example, the permutations that are lexicographically smaller than $$$[3,2,1]$$$ are:

$$$[1,2,3]$$$, $$$f([1,2,3])=1$$$;
$$$[1,3,2]$$$, $$$f([1,3,2])=3$$$;
$$$[2,1,3]$$$, $$$f([2,1,3])=3$$$;
$$$[2,3,1]$$$, $$$f([2,3,1])=2$$$;
$$$[3,1,2]$$$, $$$f([3,1,2])=2$$$.

Thus our answer is $$$[1,2,2]$$$.

Doping

Examples